top
Sled Dog Central Your on-line sled dog advertising & information source!
Sled Dog Central Home Page Current Classifieds Advertise on SDC Race Info Search Site Index Contact Us

SDC Tallk!
Discussion Forum

Place Your
Classified Here

DOGS
Dogs that Do It
Fun Photos

MUSHERS
Become a Mentor
Find a Mentor
Interviews

BEGINNERS
Start here..

BOOKSTORE
Buy online

FANS
B.A.R.K.
(Buy a Round
  of Kibble)

FEATURES
Articles
Contests
FAQ
Fun Photos
Trail Groomers
Innovations
Product Reviews
Truck Photos

FIND IT
Classified Ads
Search
Site Index
What's New

LINKS
Artists
Clothing
Clubs & Orgs
Dog Food
Dog Software
Equip & Supplies
Equip: Sleds
Iditarod
Kennels
Merchandise
Mushing Sites
ONAC
Race Sites
Rides & Tours
Sled Dog Schools
Veterinary
Video Links
Yukon Quest
Miscellaneous
Add your link

RESOURCES
Beginners Page
Books & Videos
Bookstore
Kennel Tips
Headline News
Obituaries
Publications
Check it out
Seminars &
    Socials

SDC Talk!
Skijoring

RACING
Check it out Race Schedules
Race Results
Race Web Sites

List Your Race

TRAINING
Training Trails

FUN
Fun Photos
Quiz
Today's Smile
Dude Dog

SDC
About SDC
Advertise on SDC
Contact Us
Privacy Policy

SAOVA Update May 2006

Provided by Bob Kane, Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance -
Working to identify and elect supportive legislators

Three years ago, the Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance (SAOVA) distributed a national review of anti-hunter and anti-animal breeder efforts to attack our sport and past-time. This 2006 overview isn't as thorough or detailed as that earlier "Glass Half-Full" message, simply because it's important to bring a deteriorating situation to everyone's attention without waiting until the last votes are counted in every state legislature. The antis have achieved two milestone victories on each Coast and appear on the verge of a third in Sacramento.

Most anti-breeder inspired state laws and local ordinances take the form of confiscatory licensing fees for intact animals, breeder licensing or outright breeding bans. License tag costs for breedable dogs have been increased astronomically in some areas, with spay-neuter (altered) fees a fraction of that amount. Albuquerque, NM instituted a $150 intact fee and microchip requirement on May 22, 2006. Such economic penalty measures are universally unpopular and difficult to enforce, as are private breeder restrictions.

Los Angeles County has passed an ordinance that requires all dogs to be sterilized and microchipped, effective June 3, 2006. It applies only to those dogs kept in unincorporated areas, but cities such as Los Angeles are being urged to enact similar requirements. Should the cities follow suit, 10 million people will be soon be so regulated, more than the population in *forty-four* states. Dogs may be exempt from this requirement if they are registered with an approved registry and are either titled, entered in an approved competition annually, or owned by an individual belonging to a dog club with *enforced breeding restrictions*. Animal rightists are currently fighting to further tighten these exemptions' details. Required intact licenses for breedable dogs cost $60 per year; altered ones cost $20. Litters must be reported to the county, as must every puppy buyer's identity. Additional requirements and penalties of this sterilize and track program may be found at http://animalcontrol.co.la.ca.us/html/Main1.htm  LA County says it's hiring additional animal control officers to go door to door to enforce this anti-breeder ordinance. A fringe group of AKC fanciers supported this rule, which passed without a dissenting vote.

The scope of these mandatory sterilization, ultra high cost licensing, breeder permitting, breed-specific, ownership limits, required microchipping and similar rules is hampered by a major data void - without more complete information, such rules are usually enforced very selectively and unevenly on just a few unlucky dog owners.

Virginia's HB339 fills that regulatory data void on dogs and their owners. HB339, the nation's first statewide dog owner database (Postmortem attachment above), requires every Virginia veterinarian to supply local governments with detailed dog and dog owner information on every canine given a rabies vaccination. That information is to be used for direct license invoicing and *MUST* be made publicly available. HB339's higher intact fees and a mandated sterilized differential were stripped from the bill before passage, but the Virginia Animal Control Association (VACA) vows to obtain these provisions next year. What's important to residents in other states is that VACA's principals are officers and directors in the National Animal Control Organization http://www.nacanet.org They are vigorous and vocal advocates of this Vet required animal owner data reporting program. Be forewarned. Your privacy and dogs are at extreme risk. AKC's recognized Virginia Federation of Dog Clubs and Breeders supported this bill.

The pending measure which SAOVA considers devastating is the anti-hunters' California Assembly Bill AB2110. AB2110 makes competitive open field coursing by sight hounds a criminal offense. This represents an enormous precedent that threatens all dog hunting. Open field coursing is one of the oldest forms of sport. It's currently legal in California, requiring a hunting license. Humane Society of the U.S. (HSUS) CEO Wayne Pacelle is personally lobbying for this bill, as he did the 2003 CA anti-hunting bills. AB2110 has already passed its germane Assembly law committee. It's House vote on implementation costs is currently scheduled for the Appropriations Committee on *May 24, 2006*. Please contact that committee and urge them to reject AB2110  For more information on AB2110, sight hounds and coursing see  and http://www.caninechronicle.com/Features/nelson_06/nelson_506.html   There's a related, separate piece included on how to deal with hostile press that's well worth studying and saving.

These three horrific measures and scores of others across the country http://www.hsus.org/legislation_laws/state_legislation/   illustrate that animal rightists have gained considerable ground in the last three years. What's most disturbing in this regard is the degree to which AKC corporate and its related various state groups and splinter factions are aiding and abetting in the loss of animal owners' and sportsmen's rights. AKC's role in AB2110 has been totally indefensible. AKC's 2005-2006 collaboration with HSUS and DDAL on Rick Santorum's S1139 (PAWS) bill at the federal level appears to have triggered a new degree of cooperation between certain misguided dog owners and the animal rightists.

Please carefully examine your own priorities and recent events to determine whether your clubs are supporting or damaging your interests.

Sincerely,

Bob Kane
Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance -
Working to identify and elect supportive legislators
http://saova.org/


Return to Action Alert page


top of page  |   home  |   feedback   |  search

Copyright 1997-2016 Sled Dog Central, all rights reserved.
Email Sled Dog Central